Saturday, November 20, 2010

Horus, the son of god, The original Jesus Christ.

How many Christians actually know the answer?
What man was the son of god, born of a virgin, baptized in a river by a man who was later beheaded, tempted while alone in the desert, healed the sick, cured the blind, cast out demons, walked on water, raised a man from the dead, had 12 disciples, was then crucified and resurrected 3 days later, and known as the savior, t
he good shepherd, the lamb of god, the bread of life, the son of man, the word, the fisher, the winnower?


How many of you know this man is Jesus? You are correct, but this man is also Horus, son of Osiris.  Why are the two stories so similar? 


Let us look into when the stories of both these men were recorded. One was written in around 1280 B.C. The other was scribed somewhere between 50 A.D. and 150 A.D. Naturally the story written around 50A.D.-150A.D. was a mere copy of the first account. They are so extremely similar, they are almost word for word.  The difference? One story is about a man named Jesus, the other about a man named Horus. Even the names are somewhat similar. 


Other similarities about these stories; Horus had raised a man (Asar) from the dead. Just as Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead. The name Lazarus comes from the The Hebrew name....... let me guess... ASAR!!! Oh man, the craziness. 


So which story was recorded thousands of years before the other?
The story of Horus: The Son of Osiris, was recorded in The Egyptian "Book of the Dead" around 1280 B.C.  A little over 1200 years before Jesus was even a baby. Wow, good job to the men who wrote the Gospels. What an original story, mere plagiarism at that.


So even more reason to know that the Bible is really just a bunch of crap. Yup, crap.


LDagnostic

3 comments:

  1. Seriously, I really expected better than this from this blog.

    Jesus vs. Horus completely debunked here:

    God Bless.
    -Steve

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm assuming you have never read any script from the Egyptian book of the dead. Not that it's text hold up any more than the Bible's. This person was clearly stating opinions or his sources were just very bad.

    There really isn't anything to debate about this issue. Jesus' story really is a copy of many many stories just like it.

    Everyone who has studied any mythology around the time period in the middle east understands this.

    You aren't wrong for believing what you believe. Christian's that tell people they are wrong for not believing are the ones who are faulted. And the many people believing the hypocritical text of the Bible, well; what can you say, people are gullible I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One thing i do know it will all come out in the Wash

    ReplyDelete